-->

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

What If College Is Not For Everyone?

At a time when many in higher education leadership, like the Lumina Foundation, among others, are calling for change to graduate more and more students with degrees, others are focusing for the moment on the question: What if a college education just isn't for everyone? "
It's fine for most kids to go to college, of course, (but) it is not obvious to me that that is the best option for the majority," says Mike Gould, founder of New Futures, a Washington, D.C.-based organization that provides scholarships for low-income students pursuing anything from a four-year degree to a massage-therapy certification. "Some education may be a good thing or it may just be a lot of debt."
The problem, Gould and others say, is that many high schools focus so much on college that low-achieving students fall through the cracks. A Public Agenda report this month raises similar concerns about high school guidance counseling. It follows up on a December survey that concluded most young workers who don't have a college degree "are in their jobs by chance, not by choice," and that guidance toward a career path "is hardly clear and purposeful."

Regional SCUP Events! Enjoy the F2F company of your colleagues and peers at one of three SCUP regional conferences this spring:
  • March 24–26: Cambridge, MA - "Strengths and Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats"
  • April 5–7, San Diego, CA - "Smart Planning in an Era of Uncertainty"
  • April 7, Houston, TX - "Sustaining Higher Education in an Age of Challenge"

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, March 4, 2010

College Education, Good Jobs: Why Degrees Are Overrated

The Case Against College Education is a Time.com viewpoint by Ramesh Ponnuru:
We may be close to maxing out on the first strategy. Our high college drop-out rate — 40% of kids who enroll in college don't get a degree within six years — may be a sign that we're trying to push too many people who aren't suited for college to enroll. It has been estimated that, in 2007, most people in their 20s who had college degrees were not in jobs that required them: another sign that we are pushing kids into college who will not get much out of it but debt.
The benefits of putting more people in college are also oversold. Part of the college wage premium is an illusion. People who go to college are, on average, smarter than people who don't. In an economy that increasingly rewards intelligence, you'd expect college grads to pull ahead of the pack even if their diplomas signified nothing but their smarts. College must make many students more productive workers. But at least some of the apparent value of a college degree, and maybe a lot of it, reflects the fact that employers can use it as a rough measure of job applicants' intelligence and willingness to work hard . . . It is absurd that people have to get college degrees to be considered for good jobs in hotel management or accounting — or journalism. It is inefficient, both because it wastes a lot of money and because it locks people who would have done good work out of some jobs. The tight connection between college degrees and economic success may be a nearly unquestioned part of our social order. Future generations may look back and shudder at the cruelty of it.

Regional SCUP Events! Enjoy the F2F company of your colleagues and peers at one of three SCUP regional conferences this spring:

Labels: , , ,

Monday, January 4, 2010

Do Business Schools Have Students or Customers?

The debate continues, gathering strength at the moment at business schools. Here are some opinions from higher education leaders, collected by The New York Times:
A recent article in The Chicago Tribune described a continuing debate in business schools over whether their enrollees should be regarded as “customers” rather than as traditional students. Should the students have more say over what they are taught and even how they are judged? What’s the risk of the student-consumer approach in M.B.A. programs? And does the issue reflect broader issues in higher education?
Can you match the following quotes with the debaters who wrote them? You can choose from Mark C. Taylor, Richard Vedder, David Bejou, Edward Snyder, and Stephen Joel Trachtenberg.
Students are investing time and money with a purpose in mind. The school that does not serve that purpose will not survive.

The best students don't view themselves as customers, and they shouldn't be treated as such.

Treatment of students as customers is not about grades or unrealistic expectations; it is about a new paradigm of shared governance.

The "student as customer" philosophy has created an underworked and overindulged group of future national leaders.

To deny that higher education is a product and students are customers is to duck the tough questions we should be asking.


Regional SCUP Events! Enjoy the F2F company of your colleagues and peers at one of three SCUP regional conferences this spring:

Bookmark and Share

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

College Cutbacks Make it Harder to Earn Degrees

It's not just that students are having trouble getting loans or finding money to live off of while matriculating, it's that campus cut-backs have eliminated their access to the courses they need to take in order to complete their degrees:
"They will not graduate on time. I hope they will graduate at all," said David Baggins, who as chairman of political science at Cal State University-East Bay has been bombarded with requests for spots in already packed classes.

"Before," Baggins said, "there was always a way to help the student who really needed help." This year, "all I can do is say no."

Some students struggle for places in the core entry-level classes such as composition and math because the part-time instructors who typically teach those courses are the first to be laid off in tough times. Other students are shut out of crowded core courses in their majors by upperclassmen. Some upperclassmen face an even tougher road: The upper-level classes they need have been cut entirely because they aren't popular enough.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Why Students Are Leaving Your College or University?

It might seem intuitive that most students leave a college or a university (without graduating) due to financial stress. But this company's research fiinds that nearly 3/4 of non-graduating students who leave, leave for "customer service-related reasons (includes pie charts). "We would have expected that financially motivated dropping would have risen significantly. That was not what we found. Though it could be argued that the major shift in “not worth it” is in part a financial decision. However the larger parts of the category do appear to be a combination of 'poor service and treatment' and 'college does not care.' These are combined with a sense of 'I am wasting my time and money.'"

Labels: , , ,