
More than one-fourth of all college students are taking at least one online class. In its "Room for Debate" series,
The New York Times recently asked a number of commentators "Who benefits most from online courses — students or colleges? Are online classes as educationally effective as in-classroom instruction? Should more post-secondary education take place online?"
Respondents include: Greg von Lehmen, provost and chief academic officer at University of Maryland University College (
as good as classroom lessons); Robert Zemsky, professor of education and chairman of The Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania (
another false gold rush); Anya Kamenetz, author of the forthcoming
DIY U: Edupunks, Edupreneurs and the Coming Transformation of Higher Education (
better and cheaper); Mark Bauerlein, professor of English at Emory University and the author of
The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (
making the personal connection); Karen Swan, James Stukel Distinguished Professor of Educational Leadership at the University of Illinois Springfield (flexibility and time); and Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Irving M. Ives Professor of Industrial and Labor Relations and Economics at Cornell University and director of the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (
needs more tech support). A good discussion.
Regional SCUP Events! Enjoy the F2F company of your colleagues and peers at one of three SCUP regional conferences this spring:
Labels: environmental scanning, futuring, learning, online learning, technology
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home